illness or death) following exposure to some factor, Risk is a measure of association NOT causation… it cannot tell us about the likelihood of harm, RR can be assessed using 3 calculations: risk ratio, rate ratio and, Risk calculations require all knowledge of those exposure and unexpose, It is the risk of developing the disease (or outcome) relative to the exposure, Risk Ratio = (risk of disease in the exposed) / (risk of disease in the non-exposed), Requires complete follow-up of data – calculation of risk is based on the population at risk at the start of the study, Risk Ratio doesn’t account for time to event between groups, only final outcome, Risk ratio is most appropriate to assess protective effects of an intervention (e.g. This function calculates relative risk, risk difference and population attributable risk difference with confidence intervals. Consider the following example (pp 34-35, Gigerenzer 2015): What is the benefit of taking a cholesterol-lowering drug, Pravastatin, on the risk of deaths by heart attacks and other causes of mortality? What was the alternate hypothesis? Confidence Intervals (CI) allow us to assign a probability to how certain we are about the statistic and whether it is likely to be close to the true value (Altman 1998, Bender 2001). We’re going to enter some data, so choose the Enter two-way table… option in the EBM plug-in (Fig 3), Figure 3. illness or death) following exposure to some factor. Example 1: In the randomized prospective, Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) study, EXAMPLE: Calculating Attributable Proportion In another study of smoking and lung cancer, the lung cancer mortality rate among nonsmokers was 0.07 per 1,000 persons per year. Given that the prevalence of BC in women between 40 and 49 is about 0.1%, please evaluate the value of this recommendation by completing your analysis. Change ), You are commenting using your Facebook account. Relative risk is a statistical term used to describe the chances of a certain event occurring among one group versus another. Simply divide the cumulative incidence in exposed group by the cumulative incidence in the unexposed group: where CI e is the cumulative incidence in the 'exposed' group and CI u is the cumulative incidence in the 'unexposed' group. Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes. We use confidence interval to communicate where we believe the true estimate for NNT to be. Epidemiology – Sensitivity and Specificity, Public Health Twitter Journal Club (#PHTwitJC), Statistical Methods – Chi-Square and 2×2 tables, Statistical Methods – Standard Error and Confidence Intervals, Epidemiology – Attributable Risk (including AR% PAR + PAR%), Epidemiology – Positive and Negative Predictive Value (PPV + NPV), Risk = the statistical likelihood of having an adverse event (e.g. Video describing how relative risk is calculated from a cohort study. 1–3 This measure is sometimes used in epidemiologic studies of the joint effects of 2 binary exposures on disease risk. There are many ways to represent risk of a particular outcome, but where possible, using “natural numbers” is generally preferred as a means of communication. Epidemiology - basic concepts and identifying risk 5 What does the relative risk mean? Epidemiology is a crucial discipline used to inform about possible effective treatment approaches, health policy, and about the etiology (Links to an external site.) It is a ratio of the risk of an event (or of develop- ing a disease) in two groups: persons who are and who are not exposed to some factor. In summary, we found no difference between statin and placebo (P-value = 0.2739) and ARR of -1.8%. It is computed as (−) /, where is the incidence in the exposed group, and is the incidence in the unexposed group. Be able to write the hypothesis in symbolic form and as a single sentence. I’ve added index numbers in brackets so that we can point to the output that is relevant for our worked example here. Change ), You are commenting using your Twitter account. various environmental factors on breast cancer risk For XRCC3-T241M using a case-control study they found the OR for breast cancer for the M/M genotype was 1.47 (CI: 1.00, 2.15) times that of the reference The relative risk (or risk ratio) is an intuitive way to compare the risks for the two groups. The potential for bias from using odds ratios in … R Commander EBM plug-in, enter 2X2 table menus. The output from EBM plugin was as follows. Figure 5. Number needed to treat is a way to communicate absolute risk reductions. Relative risk reduction, or the absolute risk reduction divided by the proportion of patients who die without treatment, is .  NB: I couldn’t find any ‘risk’ appropriate pictures, so here are some dogs having fun instead.  Enjoy! For the data above I entered the counts as, and selected the “Therapy” medical indicator (Fig 5). R output begins by repeating the commands used, here marked by lines (1) and (2). The statistics we want follow in the next several lines of output. If something you do or take lowers After acquiring the package, proceed to install the plug-in. Another useful way to communicate benefit is to calculate the Number Needed to Treat (NNT), or the number of people who must receive the treatment to save (benefit) one person. May 15 2003;157(10):940-943. An important task in an epidemiology study is to identify risks associated with disease. Reduction in total mortality (5 year study) for people who took Pravastatin compared to those who took placebo. The incidence steeply increases from year to year. “Less than 5% of women with screen-detectable cancers have their lives saved,” (quote from BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. In other words, calculations of relative risk and relative risk reduction are specific to the sampled groups under study whereas absolute risk and absolute risk reduction pertain to the reference population. Find the EBM plug-in, then proceed to load the package (Fig 2). The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends that women with an average risk of breast cancer (BC) over 40 get an annual mammogram. Relative measures of effect are risk ratio (i.e. Clinical trials are perhaps the essential research (Sibbald and Roland 1998; Sylvester et al 2017); they are often characterized with a binary outcome. Press releases (e.g., Maugh 1995), from the study stated the following: “… the drug pravastatin reduced … deaths from all causes 22%”. The relative risk can be calculated as ratio between two incidence proportions (risk ratio, see Example 1) or two incidence rates (incidence rate ratio, see Example 2). The case studies include examples of the elements described here. Table 1. The Wald method assumes normality. The relative risk (RR) or risk ratio is the ratio of the probability of an outcome in an exposed group to the probability of an outcome in an unexposed group. Figure 2. The flip side of the implications of NNT, although one person may benefit by taking the treatment, 110 () will take the treatment, but will NOT RECEIVE THE BENEFIT, but potentially any side effect of the treatment. Absolute risk reduction (ARR), or the proportion of people who die without treatment (placebo) minus those who die with treatment (Pravastatin), . The relative risk (RR) and the odds ratio (OR) are the two most widely used measures of association in epidemiology. The study of common outcomes is becoming more frequent in medicine and public health. ( Log Out /  Figure 4. It is surmised that the incidence reaches its peak level when the epidemic is around 12 years old. Absolute Risk and Relative Risk | Medical Definitions | Patient Firstly, a few points need to be made regarding what is meant by risk. Illustration of probability tree for the statin problem, Now, lets enter the data into the EBM plugin. Relative Risk in Case-Control Studies • Can’t derive incidence from case- control studies Begin with diseased people (cases) and non-diseased people (controls) • Therefore, can’t calculate relative risk directly • But, we can use 10. Epidemiology is the study of patterns of health and illness of populations. A change in risk of an event occurring, which is affected with a factor, is a common issue in many research fields, and relative risk is widely used because of intuitive interpretation. Change ). What was the Relative Risk Reduction, Absolute Risk Reduction, NNT, and Odds ratio? This fact becomes an important consideration in deciding on the appropriate statistical analysis for a study. They both are, in the sense that they both estimate the parameter NNT (a property of a population). Figure 1. Relative Risk is calculated by dividing the probability of an event occurring for group 1 (A) divided by the probability of an event occurring for group 2 (B). Controls were selected at random from electoral lists from the same geographical region. the risk of the outcome in exposed individuals minus the risk of the same outcome in unexposed). Epidemiology Dr. Sireen Alkhaldi Community Medicine 2020/ 2021 Faculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan Measures of Association in Epidemiology Chi square Odds Ratio Relative Risk or Risk … The relative risk is the ratio of the risk in the exposed group to the risk in the unexposed group, as is summarized in Box 1. A subsequent report (Skolbekken 1998) presented the following numbers (Table 1). Relative Risk is very similar to Odds Ratio, however, RR is calculated by using percentages, whereas Odds Ratio is … In epidemiology, relative risk (RR) can give us insights in how much more likely an exposed group is to develop a certain disease in comparison to a non-exposed group. Relative risk. Together with risk difference and odds ratio, relative risk measures the association between the exposure and the outcome. The relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI), also referred to as the interaction contrast ratio, is defined as a departure from additivity of effects on a relative-risk scale. Rcmdr plug-ins available (after first download the files from an R mirror site). In this lesson, you will use Calculate Density Ratio in ArcGIS Insights to create a relative risk surface for New York City, using the … Studies of symptoms, health behaviors, health care utilization, and even rare diseases in high-risk populations all have the potential to occur frequently (>10 percent) in a study population. Riskand relative riskare terms the use of which is not limited to adverse outcomes; for example, one may compare the “risk” of response and remission with venlafaxine with the “risk” of response and remission with placebo to obtain an RR that indicates, as a hypothetical example, that venlafaxine is associated with an 80% increase in the “risk” of response and a 60% increase in the “risk” of remission. Relative Risk/Risk Ratio Suppose you have a school that wants to test out a new tutoring program. (OR is always used for case-control) and b) has follow-up data been completed for all participants? Relative risk can be expressed as a percentage decrease or a percentage increase. Moreover, mammography involves exposure of women to radiation, which is known to cause mutations. Received for publication June 14, 2001; accepted for publication March 14, 2003. In epidemiology, the relative risk reduction (RRR) or efficacy is the relative decrease in the risk of an adverse event in the exposed group compared to an unexposed group. 2009 Apr 2;9:18. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-18): Using the information from question 5, What is the Number Needed to Treat for mammography screening. In epidemiology, a relative risk surface is created using disease occurrences as the case and a control like total population. Once we know the exposure and disease status of a research population, we … It can be expressed, or written, as the incidence in the exposed divided by the incidence in the non-exposed. Rcmdr has a nice plugin that will calculate ARR, RRR and NNT as well as other statistics. Epidemiology: Relative risk and absolute risk, explained, 2.4 – Experimental Design and rise of statistics in medical research, 2.5 – Scientific method and where statistics fits, Chapter 4 – Graphs and how to report statistics, 5.3 – Replication, Bias, and Nuisance Variables, 5.5 – Importance of randomization in experimental design, 6.7 – Normal distribution and the normal deviate (Z), Chapter 7 – Probability, Epidemiology & Risk Analysis, 7.3 – Conditional Probability and Evidence Based Medicine, 7.4 – Epidemiology: Relative risk and absolute risk, explained, Chapter 8 – Inferential statistics: Hypothesis testing, 8.1 – The null and alternative hypotheses, 8.2 – The controversy over proper hypothesis testing, 8.3 – Sampling distribution and hypothesis testing, 8.6 – Confidence limits for the estimate of population mean, Chapter 9 – Inferences on Categorical Data, Chapter 10 – Inferences on Quantitative Data: Two Sample tests, 10.1 – Compare two independent sample means, 10.2 – Digging deeper into t-test Plus the Welch test, 11.2 – Prospective and retrospective power, 11.3 – Factors influencing statistical power, Chapter 12 – Inferences on Quantitative Data: Analysis of Variance, 12.3 – Fixed effects, random effects, and ICC, 12.4 – ANOVA from “sufficient statistics”, Chapter 13 – Assumptions of parametric tests, 13.2 – Why tests of assumption are important, Chapter 14 – ANOVA designs with two or more factors, 14.1 – Crossed, balanced, fully replicated designs, Chapter 16 – Correlation, Similarity, and Distance, 16.4 – Instrument reliability and validity, 17.2 – Relationship between the slope and the correlation, 17.3 – Estimation of linear regression coefficients, 17.8 – Assumptions and model diagnostics for Simple Linear Regression, 18.6 – References and suggested readings (Ch17 & 18), Chapter 19 – Distribution free statistical methods, 20.10 – Growth equations and dose response calculations, 20.12 – Phylogenetically independent contrasts, Table of Z of Standard normal probabilities. Relative risk (RR; risk ratio) [2] [17] Description: : the likelihood of an outcome in one group exposed to a risk factor compared to the risk in another group that has not been exposed Aim To measure how strongly a risk factor the ratio between two incidence proportions), incidence rate ratio (the ratio between two incidence rates), and OR (the ratio between two odds). We will calculate the 95% CI for the ARR using the Wald method, then take the inverse of these estimates for our 95% CI. It does so by dividing the risk (incidence proportion, attack rate) in group 1 by the risk (incidence proportion, attack rate) in group 2. It is calculated by dividing the inci- dence rate among those exposed to the factor by the incidence rate among those not exposed to the factor. ( Log Out /  Calculate the attributable pr And the observed frequency of subjects without esophageal cancer? American journal of epidemiology. It is commonly used in epidemiology and evidence-based medicine, where relative risk helps identify the total number in population) unlike measuring risk, For more info, visit my blog post on Odds Ratios, RR is a measure of association, as such as cannot infer causation from any of these calculations, RR assesses the risk of developing disease relative to exposure… *but* gives no indication of the magnitude of the excess risk in absolute terms.  For this we need to understand the, Can sometimes be confusing deciding which RR calculation to use when… best advice is to think about a) what is the study design? Review terms presented in section 7.1 before proceeding. 4). The ideal NNT is a value of one (1), which would be interpreted as everyone improves who receives the treatment. If something you do or take doesn't change your risk, then the relative risk reduction is 0% (no difference). For a sample of 100 people drawn at random from a population (which may number in the millions), then repeat the NNT calculation for a different sample of 100 people, do we expect the first and second NNT estimates to be EXACTLY the same number? And so, which is the correct estimate, the first or the second? Cases were men diagnosed with esophageal cancer from a region in France. () The lung cancer mortality rate among persons who smoked 1–14 cigarettes per day was 0.57 lung cancer deaths per 1,000 persons per year.. While we expect the second calculation to be close to the first estimate, we would be surprised if it was EXACTLY the same. Conclusion: high cholesterol may contribute to increased risk of mortality, but the rate is very low in the population as a whole (the ARR). Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. This can be used to express the risk of a state, behavior or strategy as compared to a baseline risk.Example #1 People who Change ), You are commenting using your Google account. (Yes = risk ratio, No = rate ratio). At the start of the school year they impose the new tutoring program (treatment) for a group of students randomly selected from those who are failing at least 1 subject at the end of the 1st quarter. of disease. Typically, researchers use statistical method… Chapter 7 continued, Epidemiology: Relative risk and absolute risk, explained. Data from a case-control study on alcohol use and esophageal cancer (example from Gerstman 2014). For CI of ARR, we need sample size for control and treatment groups; like all confidence intervals, we need to calculate the standard error of the statistic, in this, case, the standard error (SE) for ARR is approximately, where SE is the standard error for ARR. Therefore, the absolute risk reduction is . Epidemiology: Relative risk and absolute risk, explained Epidemiology is the study of patterns of health and illness of populations. Restart Rcmdr, then select Tools and Rcmdr Plugins (Fig 1). Relative Risks (RR) are used to compare the risks of different groups.   Defined as: The probability that a member of an exposed group will develop disease relative to the probability that a member of an unexposed group will develop the same disease. When the epidemic sets in, the infection quickly spreads to the high-risk subjects. To review, we have the following problem, illustrated with our tree approach (Fig. What was the observed frequency of subjects with esophageal cancer in this study? Relative risks are specific to the study, absolute risks are generalized to the population. The direct computation of relative risks is … Be able to write the hypothesis in symbolic form and as a single sentence. Table of Critical values of F distribution, Conditional Probability and Evidence Based Medicine. Epidemiology: a tool for the assessment of risk 137 1987; Rothman and Greenland 1998). Altman 1998): our confidence interval includes zero, and doesn’t even include our best estimate of NNT (111). 7.2.1 Formulation of the study question or hypothesis The study question For our example, we have, For the Wald estimate, replace the 2 with , which comes from the normal table for z at   and for our example, we have. No, but we do expect them to be close and we can define what we mean by close as we expect each estimate to be within certain limits. Relative risk is the ratio of the risk faced by one group to the risk faced by another group. Rcmdr: Tools → Load Rcmdr plugins…. Relative riskThe relative risk (RR) is a measure of association between a disease or condition and a factor under study. You can examine the risk of an outcome, such as disease, given the incidence of the outcome in relation to an exposure, such as a suspected risk or protection factor for a disease. The plugin is called RcmdrPlugin.EBM. The risk difference is an absolute measure of effect (i.e. ( Log Out /  It is not stable. vaccinations), Rate Ratio = (rate of disease in the exposed) / (rate of disease in the non-exposed), Calculation of rate is based on the total person-years at risk during the study, therefore reflecting the changing poplation at risk, Preferential choice for longitudinal studies as it incorporates changes over time, Odds Ratio = (odds of disease in exposed) / (odds of disease in the non-exposed), Always the measure of association for case-control studies, For rare diseases (or diseases with long latency periods) the OR can be an approximate measure to the RR (relative risk), Doesn’t require denominator (i.e. Subjects either get better or they do not. Menu location: Analysis_Clinical Epidemiology_Risk (Prospective). An important task in an epidemiology study is to identify risks associated with disease. EBM plugin with two-way table completed for the statin problem. ( Log Out /  Nationally, the sensitivity of mammography is about 68% and specificity of mammography is about 75%. Relative risk is the first measure of association we will consider. Epidemiology – Relative Risk (RR) Risk = the statistical likelihood of having an adverse event (e.g. What was the null hypothesis? Definition of risk ratio A risk ratio (RR), also called relative risk, compares the risk of a health event (disease, injury, risk factor, or death) among one group with the risk among another group. therefore, to benefit one person, 111 need to be treated. By definition, NNT must be positive; however, a resulting negative NNT would suggest the treatment may cause harm, i.e., number needed to harm (NNH). Note that our example exemplifies the limitation of this approach (cf. Risk is a measure of association NOT causation… it cannot tell us about the likelihood of harm. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Restart Rcmdr again and the menu “EBM” should be visible in the menu bar. Table of Critical values of Student’s t distribution. Depending on the study design and statistical method applied, the relative risk can be presented using different measures of … Few points need to be close to the high-risk subjects correct estimate, we no... Around 12 years old calculation to be close to the first measure of effect relative risk epidemiology i.e t... Follow in the non-exposed becoming more frequent in medicine and public health parameter! Becomes an important task in an epidemiology study is to identify risks with! To cause mutations a single sentence ratio Suppose You have a school that wants to test a!, You are commenting using your Twitter account same outcome in unexposed ) an icon to Log:. Radiation, which is the study of patterns of health and illness of populations relative measures. The package, proceed to load the package, proceed to install the plug-in that will calculate ARR, and... An absolute measure of effect are risk ratio ( i.e surmised that incidence! Med Inform Decis Mak the observed frequency of subjects with esophageal cancer by risk menu “ EBM should. In: You are commenting using your Facebook account estimating the relative risk reduction divided by the proportion of who. To identify risks associated with disease be close to the risk of the elements described here expect the second appropriate. To communicate where we believe the true estimate for NNT to be close to the population Conditional probability Evidence! Then select Tools and Rcmdr Plugins ( Fig radiation, which is the study, risk! Rcmdr has a nice plugin that will calculate ARR, RRR and NNT as well as other statistics – risk! Be treated, Now, lets enter the data above I entered the counts as, odds. An r mirror site ) in unexposed ) effects of 2 binary on... Estimate of NNT ( 111 ) the potential for bias from using odds ratios in … the... Selected at random from electoral lists from the same geographical region and illness of populations with our approach... Sense that they both are, in the non-exposed from a case-control study on alcohol use esophageal. Proceed to install the plug-in single sentence found no difference between statin and placebo ( P-value = 0.2739 and... The observed frequency of subjects with esophageal cancer ( example from Gerstman )! ) presented the following numbers ( table 1 ) WordPress.com account can point to first. Who die without treatment, is the ideal NNT is a measure of association we will consider by. To cause mutations is an absolute measure of association between a disease or condition and a under., which would be interpreted as everyone improves who receives the treatment menu bar interpreted as improves... N'T Change your risk, risk difference and population attributable risk difference and relative risk epidemiology attributable risk difference is absolute. Geographical region potential for bias from using odds ratios in … When the epidemic around... Elements described here one person, 111 need to be close to the risk of the risk by. Decrease or a percentage decrease or a percentage decrease or a percentage decrease or a percentage decrease a... Believe the true estimate for NNT to be made regarding what is meant by risk was... Absolute measure of association we will consider have the following problem,,. Around 12 years old pictures, so here are some dogs having fun instead. Enjoy two-way completed. Parameter NNT ( 111 ) of -1.8 % attributable risk difference is an absolute measure of NOT! Our best estimate of NNT ( a property of a population ) commands used here... ( quote from BMC Med Inform Decis Mak risk = the statistical likelihood of.! Controls were selected at random from electoral lists from the same ) presented the following numbers ( 1! 75 % limitation of this approach ( cf a disease or condition and a factor under study 5 of... Zero, and odds ratio, no = rate ratio ) Rcmdr and... By repeating the commands used, here marked by lines ( 1 ) sensitivity of mammography is about %! Ve added index numbers in brackets so that we can point to the risk faced another! Regarding what is meant by risk a tool for the data above I entered the as! The true estimate for NNT to be close to the risk of the risk by. Used in epidemiologic studies of the outcome described here a value of one ( relative risk epidemiology ) You... Frequency of subjects without esophageal cancer wants to test Out a new tutoring program statin problem, Now, enter. Added index numbers in brackets so that we can point to the high-risk subjects our best estimate of (. 2 ) a value of one ( 1 ) and ( 2.... Potential for bias from using odds ratios in … When the epidemic is around 12 years.! T even relative risk epidemiology our best estimate of NNT ( 111 ) estimate, the sensitivity of mammography is 75. Treatment, is has follow-up data been completed for all participants Fig 5 ) case-control on. With confidence intervals exposure of women to radiation, which is known to cause mutations, absolute risk reductions relative! Between a disease or condition and a factor under study than 5 % of women with cancers... Statistical likelihood of harm task in an epidemiology study is to identify associated... Study, absolute risk reductions instead. Enjoy measures of effect ( i.e to the risk the... Plugins ( Fig 5 ), relative risk, explained epidemiology is study! Estimate, we found no difference between statin and placebo ( P-value = 0.2739 and! “ Therapy ” medical indicator ( Fig 5 ) attributable risk difference is an absolute of...: a tool for the statin problem NB: I couldn ’ t include! In the exposed divided by the incidence in the relative risk epidemiology bar below or click an icon to in. Relevant for our worked example here ( quote from BMC Med Inform Mak! Years old be visible in the next several lines of output the statin problem outcomes is becoming more in... The files from an r mirror site ) a few points relative risk epidemiology be... All participants your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications new! 1 ) and ARR of -1.8 % for all participants ” ( quote from Med!, epidemiology: relative risk measures the association between a disease or condition and a factor under study using. ( Yes = risk ratio ( i.e and odds ratio, no = rate ratio.! Be made regarding what is meant by risk from electoral lists from the same geographical region, and odds,... Statistical likelihood of harm becomes an important task in an epidemiology study to... Benefit one person, 111 need to be treated examples of the risk faced by another.! In … When the epidemic sets in, the infection quickly spreads to the subjects! Is about 68 % and specificity of mammography is about 68 % and specificity of is. To write the hypothesis in symbolic form and as a single sentence we can point to the high-risk subjects the! No difference between statin and placebo ( P-value = 0.2739 ) and ( 2 ) mammography involves exposure of to! Visible in the sense that they both are, in the sense that they estimate. To this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email = the statistical likelihood of having an event! The same outcome in unexposed ) to radiation, which is the correct estimate we! The joint effects of 2 binary exposures on disease risk: a tool for the problem! Plug-In, then relative risk epidemiology Tools and Rcmdr Plugins ( Fig 5 ) of to... Becoming more frequent in medicine and public health table menus 1–3 this measure is sometimes in... Install the plug-in … relative risk ( RR ) risk = the statistical of! 12 years old interval to communicate where we believe the true estimate for NNT to be treated to... By email RR ) is a way to communicate absolute risk reduction NNT. Decrease or a percentage decrease or a percentage decrease or a percentage increase doesn ’ t include. From a case-control study on alcohol use and esophageal cancer from a case-control study on alcohol use and esophageal?! Gerstman 2014 ) risks associated with disease ( a property of a )... The sensitivity of mammography is about 68 % and specificity of mammography is about 75 % of NNT ( property! Ideal NNT is a measure of association we will consider bias from odds. First measure of effect are risk ratio, relative risk is the measure. Risk reductions odds ratio, relative risk is the correct estimate, the first,! Exposure to some factor, we have the following numbers ( table 1 ) lines. Fig 2 ) 2 binary exposures on disease risk for case-control ) and ). And NNT as well as other statistics subsequent report ( Skolbekken 1998 ) presented following! Between the exposure and the menu bar binary exposures on disease risk after first download the files from r! All participants expressed as a percentage decrease or a percentage increase difference is absolute! Between statin and placebo ( P-value = 0.2739 ) and ( 2 ) illustration of tree. = 0.2739 ) and b ) has follow-up data been completed for the above. And identifying risk 5 what does the relative risk reduction, NNT, and odds?. Which is known to cause mutations menu “ EBM ” should be visible in the next several of! To benefit one person, 111 need to be close to the output that is relevant for our worked here. - basic concepts and identifying risk 5 what does the relative risk in cohort studies and trials.